Proving our designs to be right will only cripple growth

“War Cripples” by Otto Dix

The word “Pseudo” means fake, which stands out when we are able to distinguish it from our knowledge of the real thing. In proper definition, is a set of statements/beliefs/ideas that presents itself as science but does not meet the criteria of being referred to as such.

In this day, it’s hard to deny the common presence of Pseudoscience. From studies like Astrology, to certain diets that promise results. Contrary to Science, it attempts to persuade by appeal to emotions, faith, sentiment, or distrust of established facts.

What’s mostly unfavourable about them is the fact that they’re irrefutable. They cannot be proven wrong, and they exist to validate assumptions.

Science and Falsification

Empirical science, however, is all about falsification; the capacity for some proposition, statement, theory or hypothesis to be proven wrong, in turn, allowing room for bigger discoveries.

The requirement of falsifiability means that conclusions cannot be drawn from simple observation of a particular phenomenon.

Using the black swan problem as an illustration: If a man lives his whole life to see swans that are only white in colour, he might assume that all swans are white. For falsifiability, it isn’t necessary to know that black swans exist, but simply to understand that the hypothesis “All swans are white” would be de-bunked should a single non-white swan exist.

We can summarise the following as:

Pseudoscience Confirms

Science Disconfirms



Source link https://uxdesign.cc/--is-not-pseudoscience-3a797f71fe13?source=rss—-138adf9c44c—4

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here